July 22, 2005

Patriot & Terrorist Games

Today's Terror Headlines:

- A man was shot today in a London subway station who was believed to be a terrorist

- The same Al Qaeda related organization who claimed responsibility for London's bombing on the 7th claimed responsibility for yesterday's bombing.

- 14 of the 16 provisions in the Patriot Act were indefinitely extended. The two remaining articles- giving the government the power to demand business and library records and to conduct roving wiretaps - were extended only 10 years. The Senate is working on their own version.

- NYC transit system, the largest system in America transporting 6 million riders daily, began bag inspections on their system yesterday evening.

The city is under heavy criticism from the ACLU & NYCLU and threatening an injunction to stop the searches. However, their first day of inspections netted an arrest of a man acting suspiciously who possessed a cache of weapons.

The House version of the Patriot Act essentially leaves intact many of the antiterrorism powers that critics sought to scale back. This now sets the stage for some difficult negotiations with the Senate, which is considering several very different bills to extend the government's counterterrorism powers under the act.

Of course, Hillary was unusually quiet during yesterday's Patriot discussion and last week's Senate vote which increased the surveillance component of the act. Carolyn Miller, on the other hand, was one of the more eloquent proponents of passing indefinitely all the provisions of the House version of the Patriot Act. I wish she were a Representative here in NY instead of Michigan!

Posted by Michele at July 22, 2005 07:49 AM | TrackBack
Comments

I'm glad to see the Patriot Act renewed, but I still wish they'd have kept the sunset clauses.

It never hurts to re-visit a law from time to time.

Posted by: Harvey at July 22, 2005 03:49 PM

I have heard a lot on the news about the random searches, all with the typical spin that the MSM gives it. I was wondering what your average New Yorker felt about it? Has it been a 'gross' inconvenience for anyone? Has anyone seen or heard about someone giving the officers grief about being searched? Just wondering.

Posted by: Charles at July 22, 2005 08:29 PM

Until they admit that "racial profiling" (to use the PC term, it's actually educated guessing) would work better than random searches, I don't see the point.

Posted by: Ted at July 23, 2005 12:28 PM